You also said initially told me "he was a contractor in ahelps" then later backtracked on thatSPCR wrote: ↑Tue May 09, 2023 11:30 am Also i believe with the evidence provided, it is quite clear Spice and John Bell were working togheter and that i had more than enough reason to execute Spice(Unless you consider full enforcement of the agreement by the letter in all situations without regard for job and background by IH as something that must be enforced OOCly by admins)
I also do not see why IC lying of the contractor status was included as logs since i dont believe it is relevant to the ban. It is a common tactic to avoid giving anyone any excuse to raid IH
PM: SPCR/(/(Andres Joghs))->ValoTheBrute/(/(valothebrute BSTech)): He helped john bell.
PM: SPCR/(/(Andres Joghs))->ValoTheBrute/(/(valothebrute BSTech)): and was also a contractor himself
PM: SPCR/(/(Andres Joghs))->ValoTheBrute/(/(valothebrute BSTech)): Last time i checked , being a contractor is either pema or execution.
PM: ValoTheBrute/(/(valothebrute BSTech))->Tactical Tortoise/(/(Spice)): hes says you are a contractor but you dont show up on the antag list
PM: Tactical Tortoise/(/(Spice))->ValoTheBrute/(/(valothebrute BSTech)): im not bell was the contractor
PM: ValoTheBrute/(/(valothebrute BSTech))->SPCR/(/(Andres Joghs)): he's not on the antag list and doesnt have an uplink